Re: [RCAC] Urgent: RCAC resolution from April Meeting - please respond

Wake CAC vote Yea . Bill From: rcac-bounces(a)eastraleigh.org [mailto:rcac-bounces@eastraleigh.org] On Behalf Of Ana Duncan Pardo Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:47 AM To: RCAC Subject: [RCAC] Urgent: RCAC resolution from April Meeting - please respond Hi folks, At April's meeting we heard a report back from Phil Poe, the liaison on behalf of the CAC leaders to the UDO workgroup. Phil indicated that folks on the UDO workgroup didn't feel they had the information they needed to make the kinds of recommendations they're being asked to make on a variety of issues, including form-based planning and inclusionary zoning. The CAC leaders agreed to put forth a resolution asking for an extension of the comment period on the consultants' approach to rewriting the Unified Development Ordinance (the city's zoning code) as well as more opportunities for the public to learn about the elements being discussed and more concrete examples of these elements from the Planning Dept. and the consultants. The group agreed that a resolution should be drafted after the meeting and approved by electronic vote, and folks volunteered to draft the resolution (thanks Bill and Phil!) which is pasted below. Please respond via email with your yea or nay vote by noon on Wednesday, May 5th. Thanks! Ana Duncan Pardo Chair, Hillsborough CAC Chair, RCAC (919) 818-5933 RCAC suggestion to City Council on the UDO ------------------------ Where As the UDO is a complex process of great importance to Raleigh that touches on every aspect of the future of our city and communities; Where As the Complexity of the project requires significant commitment of time from the pubic to comprehend the concepts, informatively discuss and provide input; Where As the Importance to clearly define requirements for Code Studio is critical; Where As similar Projects in other cities have taken 2 to 3 times longer to complete than Raleigh's time table; Therefore Let It Be Resolved that the Diagnostic and Approach phase be extended at least 2 months; And Further Resolved that Good Examples - both visual and written - be provided to help the public better understand the UDO concepts and processes; And Further Resolved that More workshops be conducted to deal with the more challenging issues like affordable housing and context and district mapping; And Further Resolved that Test / Pilot cases be developed to help the public understand what the final code will look like and be interpreted; And Further Resolved that City Council re-examine the timeline and deliverables to ensure Code Studio is able to deliver a complete and quality product at the end of 18 months.