Hi folks,
Several comments .
We are, as elected chairs of the RCAC/CAC representing our constituents, to
provide council to the City Council- and that should be our guiding
principle in all of activities.
With that in mind I have several thoughts as to philosophy & process of
these kind of issues .
I would suggest that the bigger picture is whether we make our own decisions
and send to City Council or delegate those selections to other bodies. While
it may be unclear whether we have the power to appoint our own folks from
the RCAC to various bodies, if we don't exercise that choice we will have
decided we do not have that authority and that would be a shame. HERE we are
told we have 3 reps (and 3 is very generous) and we should make those
recommendations - perhaps one day we will be a part of the decision process
where we suggest what our level of participation should be. Over the past
several years we have had a lot of discussion about appointing folks to key
city committees. We have even entertained recommending to Council a proposal
that the RCAC be given a recommendation 'slot' on all the major committees
where we make our recommendation to Council for appointment. One of the key
reasons for this idea was to have folks at our RCAC table that were directly
involved in the key City committees and it would serve both as expertise for
us as individual chairs but also provide leadership for the RCAC as we make
key recommendations back to City Council. In all honesty we don't
participate in those appointments but if you want to empower the RCAC/CAC
this might be a exciting way to reach that goal.
In the UDO we are to have 3 'representatives from the RCAC' - it is an
opportunity to take an assertive step and make those recommendations. How
these recommendations come about speaks volumes about the empowerment of the
CACs - so this provides a real opportunity to understand how the process
works and if we don't like it, work with the City/Council to change it.
As the RCAC/CACs are autonomous bodies, to not tap our expertise to appoint
folks to this committee misses an opportunity to have folks on that
committee serve that we know represent our values. I am not a proponent for
letting someone else tell the RCAC who should represent us since it will
lead us to act individually with the 'powers that be' to get the
appointments we want'; this would discourage working together collectively
and shift accountability to the appointing body when it should be the
RCAC/CAC.
This UDP Advisory Group will require a lot of time . and thus I would expect
anyone representing the RCAC be committed to having not only this additional
time for the UDO but also 1) the time to commit to the CAC chairs so that
they will be able to have both input and 2) help lead the RCAC to make
council to the City on key issues that cross all CAC boundaries. In short
this means coming to the RCAC meetings and being involved in our activities.
So can we assume from each of the 6 volunteers that they are willing to
commit not only the time to the UDO but also to the RCAC & CAC chairs to
carry their issues and bring back to the RCAC the knowledge and
recommendation where we can collaborate to press key issues within our
communities?
By the way just because we have three official appointees, it does not
preclude that others can't be very involved and also attend these public
meetings. Were others interested in doing this I would expect our 'official
reps' to make sure their concerns and suggestions were part of the
discussion.
We need a process for times like this . for now we can leave it to the
executive committee (that is why we elected them); call for a vote over
email or by phone; or call a special meeting of the RCAC if this issues is
critical enough. In January I think we need to have this discussion at our
January meeting because these issues continue to come up several times a
year and we need a process with which we are all comfortable.
Thanks for reading my ramblings!
Regards, Bill
From: rcac-bounces(a)eastraleigh.org [mailto:rcac-bounces@eastraleigh.org] On
Behalf Of Ana Duncan Pardo
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 9:12 AM
To: RCAC
Subject: Re: [RCAC] Fwd: Zoning code update advisory group--finalizing CAC
leader part...
Hi folks,
We now have a total of six chairs who have expressed interest in
participating on the UDO Advisory Group. After discussing it with Alan
Wiggs, we think the best thing to do is to simply send the list of the six
nominees to Council and Planning. The only firm recommendation is for Paul
Brant, as he volunteered and was accepted by the RCAC at the November
meeting. The other nominees will be listed in the order in which they were
nominated, as follows:
Phil Poe
Mark Turner
Danny Coleman
Justin Fischer
Elizabeth Byrd
Sound OK? Unless anyone objects to doing it this way, I'll send the letter
to the appropriate folks at the end of the day today.
Ana
On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:30 AM, Southralcap(a)aol.com wrote:
Nothing personal, Danny, but Phil, Mark and Paul know more about concerns of
the various CAC's. I agree with Lonnette's choices.
Mary Belle
In a message dated 11/30/2009 3:28:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
acpardo(a)gmail.com writes:
Please see Lonnette Williams' message below.
ADP
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Frances Williams <flonnettewms(a)bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [RCAC] Zoning code update advisory group--finalizing CAC leader
participants
To: Ana Duncan Pardo <acpardo(a)gmail.com>
Hi,
My choices are Phil Poe, Mark Turner and Paul Brant to represent the RCAC on
this task force. I had not seen Danny's when I first responded; it remains
the first three who volunteered .
Lonnette
--- On Mon, 11/30/09, Ana Duncan Pardo <acpardo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ana Duncan Pardo <acpardo(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RCAC] Zoning code update advisory group--finalizing CAC leader
participants
To: "Frances Williams" <flonnettewms(a)bellsouth.net>
Date: Monday, November 30, 2009, 3:15 PM
Lonnette,
Thanks for weighing in. Which three? Can you post your preference to the
group?
Ana
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Frances Williams
<flonnettewms(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
Hi,
I am good with those three representing the RCAC.
Lonnette
--- On Mon, 11/30/09, Ana Duncan Pardo <acpardo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ana Duncan Pardo <acpardo(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [RCAC] Zoning code update advisory group--finalizing CAC leader
participants
To: "RCAC" <rcac(a)eastraleigh.org>
Date: Monday, November 30, 2009, 12:06 PM
Hi folks,
Per our discussion at the November RCAC meeting, I'm writing to follow
up about our participation in the Unified Development Ordinance
advisory group. This group will be made up of different types of
stakeholders in the development process, and will give input on the
re-working of the city's zoning codes.
There are three seats available for CAC leaders. So far Paul Brant,
Phil Poe and Mark Turner have expressed an interest in participating.
We need to confirm our representatives and then I'll send a message to
Planning and Council to let them know who will be representing us.
Paul, Phil and Mark - can you confirm that you are willing to
participate on behalf of the RCAC? Is anyone else interested in
participating? It's up to us to agree on who we want to act as our
representatives, and anyone can step up. You don't need to be an
expert, either--the city will be providing in-depth training to the
advisory group members so that everyone will be on the same page.
If you're already expressed an interest in representing the RCAC in
this group, please confirm. If you're newly interested, please let me
know by responding to this e-mail. As soon as we've confirmed our
picks, I'll notify the appropriate folks in city government.
Thanks,
Ana Duncan Pardo
Chair, Hillsborough and Raleigh CAC
(919) 818-5933
_______________________________________________
RCAC mailing list
RCAC(a)eastraleigh.org
http://www.eastraleigh.org/mailman/listinfo/rcac
_______________________________________________
RCAC mailing list
RCAC(a)eastraleigh.org
http://www.eastraleigh.org/mailman/listinfo/rcac