Visit.
http://fivepointscac.org/newraleighcode/
to get quick access to relevant content related to the Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO) project. On the front page below the RTNSV banner, you will
find a new section called the 21st Century City Lecture Series. The workshop
video is included here, as well as other videos that can help with the
assessment of the Diagnostic & Approach Report.
Philip W Poe
Co-Chair, Five Points CAC
PWPoe(a)att.net
919.832.6777 voice
919.522.1078 mobile
919.832.6775 fax
www.fivepointscac.org
Everyone,
I heard about the rolling recycle carts some time ago and am looking
forward to having one. A rolling cart will be much easier to get to the curb
than lugging the bin full of papers, plastic bottles cans, etc. - at my age
that is a challenge my back and I do not enjoy. Currently it is wasteful to
have a recycle truck come every week if some people do little recycling.
Once every two weeks to empty a bin makes more sense. As for the size of
the recycle cart, there are options, just like those for our garbage carts.
Remember, before the City started a recycling program, we had to take our
recyclables to a few designated sites throughout the city - just as we do
now with telephone books. At future SWCAC meetings and in our newsletter, I
will be begging folks to recycle even more when they get their rolling
carts..
My biggest frustration is that people do not recycle every item they can -
that's what being "green" is about. I was lucky - my mother taught me to
recycle as a child many, many, many years ago. If people had lived in
Raleigh long enough, they would remember the City's challenge to find enough
land to expand our "garbage mountain." The more stuff people can recycle,
the less land Raleigh will have to buy for a garbage dump when the present
dump is full or if they cannot find land, the garbage will have to be shipped
somewhere away from here at a much greater expense. Do not forget some
items that should be recycled are toxic to our water supplies. Recycling
saves additional expenses of purifying our drinking water, too.
Leaving to our children and other family members land that is as green as
possible will be just as important as leaving them our home and money.
Please make a positive adjustment to this bin-to-cart change.
Thanks for reading my email. I do not want to step on people's toes, but
I so strongly believe in recycling.
Mary Belle Pate
In a message dated 2/17/2010 12:40:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
linda(a)lindawatson.com writes:
I was surprised and disappointed to see in the paper today that Raleigh
will be using big new plastic recycling containers and decreasing the
number of city employees (no layoffs, but a net loss of jobs).
We had a presentation about recycling at a recent Glenwood CAC meeting,
but I don't recall any mention of this new plan. I took a
survey that a friend forwarded to me, but otherwise didn't know about
the upcoming changes until seeing the article today. The survey
mentioned a tax increase to pay for the new program, but the article
today didn't mention one.
Was the RCAC informed of this change? I know the people in the recycling
department work hard and have great intentions, but I would have liked
to have a more public discussion of the pros and cons of this program
before seeing it approved, including RCAC notification.
For example:
* What is the environmental impact of throwing away the bins we already
have and buying new ones?
* Where will the new ones come from? A Raleigh firm would be good, a
Chinese firm would be very bad.
* Is it a good use of tax money to replace jobs with big plastic bins
and fancy trucks?
* Should we be striving to increase the volume of material recycled or
to decrease the amount of overall waste?
Sincerely yours,
Linda Watson
Glenwood CAC chair
_______________________________________________
RCAC mailing list
RCAC(a)eastraleigh.org
http://www.eastraleigh.org/mailman/listinfo/rcac
Dear Councilors and City Staff:
Please see the resolution below, passed at yesterday's Raleigh Citizens'
Advisory Council meeting, regarding public notice of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment period.
We have learned since last night's meeting that the cut-off date for
amendments has now been properly established as May 1, which addresses one
of the requests in the resolution. However, we ask that you also honor our
related requests for proper and adequate public notification of the
amendment period, as detailed in the resolution below.
Respectfully,
Ana Duncan Pardo
Chair, Raleigh Citizens' Advisory Council
--------------------
Resolution regarding proper public notice of the Comp Plan amendment period
*Raleigh Citizens' Advisory Council meeting, 2/17/2010
*
*Background:* On May 26, 2009 the Planning Commission passed a motion that
all future comments (concerning the new Comprehensive Plan) be reviewed six
months after Plan adoption. There was an indication at that time that
Mitchell Silver, the City Planning Director, had provided staff’s suggested
recommendations for new request submittals.
On Feb 10, 2010 a new Comprehensive Plan Amendment Petition form and process
was published on the City web site without announcement or links from any
other web site pages.
On Feb 16, 2010 during a related Citizen Petition item Mitchell Silver
indicated requests using the new form could be made without the customary
development fee of $514.00 but would need to be received by April 1, 2010.
There is some confusion as to the specific dates associated with the
Planning Commission’s motion to establish a 6 month window for new comments,
the process forms involved or that it was without charge. Very little
public awareness of this process has been made available.
*Resolution:* As advocates for Raleigh citizens, the RCAC requests the City
Planning Department take the following action:
1. Make the process for petitioning to amend the Comprehensive Plan more
visible on the City web site with appropriate links to ensure easy public
access.
2. Request Public Affairs to announce the amendment process by Mar 1, 2010
indicating clearly the closing date for input, the waiver of customary fees
during this window and the dates of the Public Hearing where these new
requests will be heard.
3. Establish a web based log to track these Comprehensive Plan Amendment
requests from Nov 1, 2009 forward with the location linked from the
Comprehensive Plan web page and similarly related city web site pages.
4. Confirm the cutoff date as May 1, 2010 for submitting no-charge amendment
requests.
Approved unanimously on Feb 17, 2010 by RCAC motion.
Ana Duncan Pardo
RCAC Chair
Thanks Beth! We were very excited about the improved ability for residents
to find their CAC. I look forward to the big switch!
Ana
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Stagner, Beth <
Beth.Stagner(a)ci.raleigh.nc.us> wrote:
> RCACs,
>
>
>
> Thank you for being a receptive and interested audience last night for the
> web portal demo. It was great to hear your comments as it was the first time
> we have previewed it to citizens outside of City staff. I am very sorry that
> the mapping part was unavailable last night, so I have attached some screen
> shots of what *you would have seen*.
>
> Note, the hyperlink that I have highlighted in yellow goes to the portal
> page that discusses the CACs, lists the newsletters, maps, etc. Hopefully it
> could not be any easier for citizens to find you!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Beth C. Stagner, GISP
> Web Services Manager
> City of Raleigh - Information Technology
> 222 West Hargett St, Room 502
> Post Office Box 590
> Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-0590
> Phone: 919.996.5485
>
> Fax: 919.996.7179
> Email: Beth.Stagner(a)ci.raleigh.nc.us
> Website: www.raleighnc.gov
>
>
>
> *Customer** Support Center**: 919.996.6000*
>
>
>
> “E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
> Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
> authorized City or Law Enforcement official.”
>
>
CAC Chairs,
FYI
Paul
paulbrant(a)mindspring.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Brant
To: Silver, Mitchell ; Bowers, Kenneth
Cc: Meeker, Charles ; Odom, John ; West, James P. ; Crowder, Thomas ; McFarlane, Nancy ; Stephenson, Russ ; Baldwin, Mary-Ann ; Gaylord, Bonner ; Allen, Russell
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Cutoff Date
Mitchell,
Thanks
Paul
paulbrant(a)mindspring.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Silver, Mitchell
To: 'Paul Brant' ; Bowers, Kenneth
Cc: Meeker, Charles ; Odom, John ; West, James P. ; Crowder, Thomas ; McFarlane, Nancy ; Stephenson, Russ ; Baldwin, Mary-Ann ; Gaylord, Bonner ; Allen, Russell
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Cutoff Date
Paul,
You are correct. The six month amendment instead of annual process had not been broadcasted. The initial six-month period after adoption for land use amendments was announced several times during the Planning Commission and City Council process because land use amendments kept coming in after the public comment period had closed. The six-month amendment process will be posted on our website in an appropriate location.
Mitchell Silver, PP, AICP
Director,
Department of City Planning & Urban Design Center
One Exchange Plaza, PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
919.516.2625 phone
919.516.2684 fax
e-mail: mitchell.silver(a)ci.raleigh.nc.us
Department: www.raleighnc.gov/planning
Comprehensive Plan: www.planningraleigh2030.com
Zoning Code: www.NewRaleighCode.com
From: Paul Brant [mailto:paulbrant@mindspring.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:30 AM
To: Silver, Mitchell; Bowers, Kenneth
Cc: Meeker, Charles; Odom, John; West, James P.; Crowder, Thomas; McFarlane, Nancy; Stephenson, Russ; Baldwin, Mary-Ann; Gaylord, Bonner; Allen, Russell
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Cutoff Date
Mitchell;
I appreciate you clarifying the date issue and the information in the Comprehensive Plan. I assume the recent development of the Amendment form and process was in response to Action item IM 3.1 in Section N. However the initial 6 month review period and fee waiver still needs additional clarity and visibility. I trust that information will soon be part of your update to the web page covering the initial and ongoing Amendment process.
Paul
paulbrant(a)mindspring.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Silver, Mitchell
To: 'Paul Brant' ; Bowers, Kenneth
Cc: Meeker, Charles ; Odom, John ; West, James P. ; Crowder, Thomas ; McFarlane, Nancy ; Stephenson, Russ ; Baldwin, Mary-Ann ; Gaylord, Bonner ; Allen, Russell
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 5:11 PM
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Cutoff Date
Paul,
The cut off is May 1. We suggested April 1 (six months after the date the Council adopted the plan), but later changed it to May 1 (six months after the plan became effective). In terms of posting to the web site. The City web site will be revamped and we are working with IT to understand how much information we can post on the new City website. Our goal is to post as much information as possible for the public.
I inserted highlights regarding the annual updates, which is found in the Implementation Section on the plan.
N.3 Comprehensive Plan Updates
and Amendments
This section addresses the process for monitoring,
amending, and updating the Comprehensive Plan.
It outlines the amendment process and
recommended timeframe for amendment cycles as
well as for the more extensive periodic update of
the Comprehensive Plan every five years.
The City should establish a yearly cycle for minor
plan amendments to maintain its relevancy to the
public and city government. The cycle should be
timed to follow the annual progress assessment, so
that lagging implementation items can be revisited.
The yearly amendment process should provide an
opportunity for individuals, groups, or city agencies
to propose a minor amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to address changing social and
market conditions or reflect new facility plans and
work programs. Minor amendments may include
changes to the text or maps of the Comprehensive
Plan. Each proposed amendment will require the
applicant to provide the burden of proof for the
change or addition.
Policy IM 3.1
Five-Year Updates
Update the Comprehensive Plan every five
years to remain current and relevant, with a
particular focus on the Plan's policy actions.
(3, 6)
Policy IM 3.2
Annual Amendments
Amend the Comprehensive Plan on a yearly
basis so the Plan may address changes in
demography, economic markets, and public
priorities. (1, 3, 6)
Action IM 1.2
Annual Review of Development Regulations
Annually review and update the City's
regulations to account for any adopted
Comprehensive Plan amendments,
emerging issues, and market or real
estate trends.
Mitchell Silver, PP, AICP
Director,
Department of City Planning & Urban Design Center
One Exchange Plaza, PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
919.516.2625 phone
919.516.2684 fax
e-mail: mitchell.silver(a)ci.raleigh.nc.us
Department: www.raleighnc.gov/planning
Comprehensive Plan: www.planningraleigh2030.com
Zoning Code: www.NewRaleighCode.com
From: Paul Brant [mailto:paulbrant@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:03 PM
To: Silver, Mitchell; Bowers, Kenneth
Cc: Meeker, Charles; Odom, John; West, James P.; Crowder, Thomas; McFarlane, Nancy; Stephenson, Russ; Baldwin, Mary-Ann; Gaylord, Bonner; Allen, Russell
Subject: Comp Plan Amendment Cutoff Date
Mitchell,
At today's Council Meeting, during my Citizen Petition, you indicated April 1st was the cutoff date for submitting suggested amendments to the new Comp Plan based on the 6 month window established by the Planning Commission. This was to be from Nov 1, 2009, the date the Plan was effective. I suggested May 1, 2010 was my understanding and you corrected me by stating April 1, 2010 was the date which is really only 5 months from the effective date. I believe the correct cutoff date should be May 1, 2010 or at a minimum Friday April 30, 2010 since that is the last business day of the 6 month period.So there is no doubt as to what the date really is, I suggest you place the cutoff date and related Public Hearing date on the Planning Department's web site so the general public will clearly understand the window.
Reading through the Comprehensive Plan web page there is no mention of the Amendment process or time frame; nor is there any mention of this form or process in the Comprehensive Plan itself. It seems to be a well intended plan of the Planning Commission to accommodate the public but not well communicated. I assume their intent is recorded in a set of minutes somewhere but I doubt that the average citizen is able to find that information or even knows where to look.
I will ask the RCAC to make a formal request to the City to make this information, with a link to the new Amendment Form, available on the Comprehensive Plan web site so everyone can understand the opportunity not just a few closely connected and well informed professionals.
Paul
paulbrant(a)mindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
â?oE-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized City or Law Enforcement official.â?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized City or Law Enforcement official."
13th Annual Service Raleigh: Saturday, March 27, 2010
RCAC leadership,
Following up on NCSUs Service Raleigh discussed at the RCAC last evening:
Partner and Volunteer Registration for Service Raleigh is Open until Friday,
March 5, 2010
Web Site: http://www.serviceraleigh.org/
Email: serviceraleigh(a)ncsu.edu
Service Raleigh each year offers us the opportunity to work together to
improve our community. On March 27th over 2000 Service Raleigh volunteers
will come together to work on projects throughout Raleigh and they are now
seeking Partners (that would be you) who will identify worthwhile projects
within our community. In the past volunteers have planted 1000s of trees in
our Parks and along our greenways (and will be planting ~400 trees this year
in East Raleigh with Trees Across Raleigh), helped in maintenance of an
historic cemetery, painted & insulated houses, installed low-flow devices in
low income communities, cleaned streams & vacant lots, worked on school
playgrounds you get the idea. This is both a wonderful opportunity and a
wonderful service for us to work together to enhance our community.
Partners would be expected to provide the project including tools,
equipment, special expertise (if needed) and coordination. Service Raleigh
provides the volunteers. Dont forget that the CACs do have some monetary
resources that may be available for supplies, etc.
This is a wonderful service so please look around your community, schools,
churches, open areas and be è creative! & partner with Service Raleigh.
Thanks, Bill
Co-Chair Wade Citizen Advisory Council
http://www.serviceraleigh.org/
Partner Registration is Open
Partner registration for Service Raleigh 2010 is now open! You can sign-up
through the website by visiting the Partners page. Registration must be
completed by Friday, March 5th.
Volunteer Registration is Open
Volunteer registration for Service Raleigh 2010 is now open. You can
sign-up as an individual or a group through the website by visiting the
Volunteer page. Sign up by Friday, March 5th!
If you have Questions about Service Raleigh & becoming a Partner contact:
Holley Nichols: Asst Director of Park Scholars
919-515-3794 (holley_nichols(a)ncsu.edu)
If you have questions about types of projects in the past, community
coordination & benefit, etc.
please feel free to contact me (Bill) at:
919-264-7114 (cell), 919-787-6378 (home) or email: Bill(a)BillPadgett.com
CAC Chairs,
Update on the above subject.
Paul
paulbrant(a)mindspring.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Brant
To: Silver, Mitchell ; Bowers, Kenneth
Cc: Meeker, Charles ; Odom, John ; West, James P. ; Crowder, Thomas ; McFarlane, Nancy ; Stephenson, Russ ; Baldwin, Mary-Ann ; Gaylord, Bonner ; Allen, Russell
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Cutoff Date
Mitchell;
I appreciate you clarifying the date issue and the information in the Comprehensive Plan. I assume the recent development of the Amendment form and process was in response to Action item IM 3.1 in Section N. However the initial 6 month review period and fee waiver still needs additional clarity and visibility. I trust that information will soon be part of your update to the web page covering the initial and ongoing Amendment process.
Paul
paulbrant(a)mindspring.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Silver, Mitchell
To: 'Paul Brant' ; Bowers, Kenneth
Cc: Meeker, Charles ; Odom, John ; West, James P. ; Crowder, Thomas ; McFarlane, Nancy ; Stephenson, Russ ; Baldwin, Mary-Ann ; Gaylord, Bonner ; Allen, Russell
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 5:11 PM
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Cutoff Date
Paul,
The cut off is May 1. We suggested April 1 (six months after the date the Council adopted the plan), but later changed it to May 1 (six months after the plan became effective). In terms of posting to the web site. The City web site will be revamped and we are working with IT to understand how much information we can post on the new City website. Our goal is to post as much information as possible for the public.
I inserted highlights regarding the annual updates, which is found in the Implementation Section on the plan.
N.3 Comprehensive Plan Updates
and Amendments
This section addresses the process for monitoring,
amending, and updating the Comprehensive Plan.
It outlines the amendment process and
recommended timeframe for amendment cycles as
well as for the more extensive periodic update of
the Comprehensive Plan every five years.
The City should establish a yearly cycle for minor
plan amendments to maintain its relevancy to the
public and city government. The cycle should be
timed to follow the annual progress assessment, so
that lagging implementation items can be revisited.
The yearly amendment process should provide an
opportunity for individuals, groups, or city agencies
to propose a minor amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to address changing social and
market conditions or reflect new facility plans and
work programs. Minor amendments may include
changes to the text or maps of the Comprehensive
Plan. Each proposed amendment will require the
applicant to provide the burden of proof for the
change or addition.
Policy IM 3.1
Five-Year Updates
Update the Comprehensive Plan every five
years to remain current and relevant, with a
particular focus on the Plan's policy actions.
(3, 6)
Policy IM 3.2
Annual Amendments
Amend the Comprehensive Plan on a yearly
basis so the Plan may address changes in
demography, economic markets, and public
priorities. (1, 3, 6)
Action IM 1.2
Annual Review of Development Regulations
Annually review and update the City's
regulations to account for any adopted
Comprehensive Plan amendments,
emerging issues, and market or real
estate trends.
Mitchell Silver, PP, AICP
Director,
Department of City Planning & Urban Design Center
One Exchange Plaza, PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
919.516.2625 phone
919.516.2684 fax
e-mail: mitchell.silver(a)ci.raleigh.nc.us
Department: www.raleighnc.gov/planning
Comprehensive Plan: www.planningraleigh2030.com
Zoning Code: www.NewRaleighCode.com
From: Paul Brant [mailto:paulbrant@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:03 PM
To: Silver, Mitchell; Bowers, Kenneth
Cc: Meeker, Charles; Odom, John; West, James P.; Crowder, Thomas; McFarlane, Nancy; Stephenson, Russ; Baldwin, Mary-Ann; Gaylord, Bonner; Allen, Russell
Subject: Comp Plan Amendment Cutoff Date
Mitchell,
At today's Council Meeting, during my Citizen Petition, you indicated April 1st was the cutoff date for submitting suggested amendments to the new Comp Plan based on the 6 month window established by the Planning Commission. This was to be from Nov 1, 2009, the date the Plan was effective. I suggested May 1, 2010 was my understanding and you corrected me by stating April 1, 2010 was the date which is really only 5 months from the effective date. I believe the correct cutoff date should be May 1, 2010 or at a minimum Friday April 30, 2010 since that is the last business day of the 6 month period.So there is no doubt as to what the date really is, I suggest you place the cutoff date and related Public Hearing date on the Planning Department's web site so the general public will clearly understand the window.
Reading through the Comprehensive Plan web page there is no mention of the Amendment process or time frame; nor is there any mention of this form or process in the Comprehensive Plan itself. It seems to be a well intended plan of the Planning Commission to accommodate the public but not well communicated. I assume their intent is recorded in a set of minutes somewhere but I doubt that the average citizen is able to find that information or even knows where to look.
I will ask the RCAC to make a formal request to the City to make this information, with a link to the new Amendment Form, available on the Comprehensive Plan web site so everyone can understand the opportunity not just a few closely connected and well informed professionals.
Paul
paulbrant(a)mindspring.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
â?oE-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized City or Law Enforcement official.â?
Our wonderful Glenwood CAC Secretary Margaret Link tells me that this
program was mentioned at our CAC meeting but there was no discussion
about it. I'm sorry to say that I didn't grasp the implications at the time.
So at least the Glenwood CAC was informed. My other questions still
stand: what was the level of citizen involvement in this and is it the
right direction?
... Linda
******
original note:
I was surprised and disappointed to see in the paper today that Raleigh
will be using big new plastic recycling containers and decreasing the
number of city employees (no layoffs, but a net loss of jobs).
We had a presentation about recycling at a recent Glenwood CAC meeting,
but I don't recall any mention of this new plan. [...]
Sincerely yours,
Linda Watson
Glenwood CAC chair